The problem of time and usage licence of Artworks News

A short digression on the subject of use licence and registration timings.

Over 1,2 billion works were registered with a Creative Commons licence in 2016. Written works, videos, songs, illustrations, photos. The copyright attributed to an artwork with a Creative Commons licence is used more and more every year, showing how the creativity of artists is growing. However, an artwork being licenced with a Creative Commons licence does not mean that the people using the artwork respect the licence terms.

The licence is attributed to an artwork upon its first publication. This defines how it can be reproduced, copied, distributed, modified, or used for commercial purposes. Some online services, such as 500px or YouTube, introduced the possibility to attribute a Creative Commons licence to their work upon upload on their websites.

Even when a picture or photo is published on Facebook, for instance, you give the social network a non-exclusive licence for free usage of the published material, until it is removed from the website (which is the moment when the licence ends, ref. Terms and conditions of use, section 2, "Sharing your content and information", paragraphs 1-5).

Every website, social network, portal has a policy of content use and share. If we asked how many people read the terms and conditions of any of the most common social networks, however, we probably wouldn't be able to count them on a whole hand.

What's the dilemma in all of this? The point of origin.

Since controlling the spread of digital works online is impossible, the only moment when something can be done, is the moment the artwork is created. It is also the moment when it is possible to attribute a licence to the artwork, to rely on when necessary. Furthermore, if one uses several social networks to share their artwork (for instance Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Tumblr, etc.), remembering the exact order of publication to determine where it was published first, can be extremely complicated.

The idea behind Rights Chain is allowing Artists to create the "point of origin" of their works, marking the creation date and Author, but also attributing a licence to the work. The licence can't be altered once the work has been publicly shared, which makes that a crucial moment to properly define it.

For instance, with Creative Commons licences, the “CC BY” model allows anyone to share the original work through any means, to edit it, and use it for commercial purposes, provided that the Author is properly attributed to it, the licence is mentioned, and it is indicated whether the file has been modified.

For this CC licence to be applicable, however, it is necessary that the licence be mentioned together with the first publication of the work itself, otherwise the validity of the licence will be hard to prove and support.

The idea that Rights Chain is based on, is giving the possibility to attribute a licence to the artwork upon registration, including a Creative Commons licence. If done before sharing the work through any means, there will always be a place where the creation date and the licence of the artwork are clearly stated. And thanks to the technology we're using, this information is not only unalterable in time, but also verifiable at any moment.

In the page of the shared work, we have placed the official CC logo for the attributed licence, plus the link to access the full description of the licence directly on the Creative Commons website.

Our ambition is to offer a tool that can truly help those who need it, by examining several aspects of the artwork registration issue, and by simplifyig its use, without trivialising the problem connected to the Intellectual Property of the single individuals who create new artworks every day.

Sebastian Zdrojewski

System, Network and Data Security advisor for over 20 years, in 2017 co-founded Rights Chain, a company aiming the development of copyright and intellectual property protection and enforcement solutions.

Last update 2018-05-30

#Copyright, #Authorsrights, #Creativecommons, #Cc, #Licence

Last articles

Rights Chain Gallery

by Luca Donnarumma, 2018-12-13

We're glad to introduce you to one of the first events that Rights Chain will organise in 2019 together with the association OchaCaffé

Rights Chain Update

by Luca Donnarumma, 2018-12-11

Today we released an update to our platform which adds three buttons under each picture in our gallery.

Interview to Giorgia Lanza

by Redazione Rights Chain, 2018-12-10

Giorgia Lanza talks with us about her experience on solving an incident where her copyright was being infringed

The root of art on Tumblr

by Luca Donnarumma, 2018-12-05

Tumblr isn't just deleting porn, it's removing the roots of digital art; maybe it's not that important however, after all there's so much lewd art online that we'll have forgotten all about these artists in a few days.

Reverse Image Search

by Luca Donnarumma, 2018-12-03

Did you know that there is a very simple way to check the status of your artworks on the Internet

NSFW and forced removal: what happens to the copyright?

by Sebastian Zdrojewski, 2018-11-27

What happens to our rights over our content if it is removed from the web for any reason?

In which countries are my rights over an artwork recognised, and for how long?

by Redazione Rights Chain, 2018-11-22

What does the Berne convention say about this?

Character Design

by Luca Donnarumma, 2018-10-08

A number of linked elements can lead to a well-designed character, if the final objective is clear.

Bowser, Bowsette, Nintendo and FanArts: how much are fandoms worth?

by Sebastian Zdrojewski, 2018-10-01

What's the worth of fandoms for entertainment giants? Nintendo allows us (once again) to realise how heavily the fanart "market" can influence the success of companies.

Fumettopolis 2018

by Sebastian Zdrojewski, 2018-09-12

A short reflection after the Fumettopolis 2018 event organised by Indieversus in Novara.